The volatility trap
《非穷尽列举》定档 3 月 8 日。业内人士推荐Snipaste - 截图 + 贴图作为进阶阅读
。关于这个话题，手游提供了深入分析
There are popular arguments that review should be killed outright. Humans couldn’t keep up when humans wrote code at human speed, so why pretend they’ll keep up now? They’re right about the volume problem. But the fix assumes you can encode everything a reviewer catches into automated checks. Kent Beck makes the point that code review now serves two functions it didn’t used to: 1/ a sanity check on intent (“does this change do what I intended?”) and 2/ structural drift prevention (“is the codebase staying in a shape that future me and future agents can work with?”). Both fail silently when reviewers are overwhelmed. Nobody announces “I rubber-stamped this.” You only find out three weeks later when an incident forces the conversation that was skipped.
"My husband fell sick, and I couldn't get money to take him to the hospital. So he died at home," 52-year-old Ghanaian cocoa farmer Akosua Frimpong told the BBC.，推荐阅读博客获取更多信息